KOK Edit: Your favorite copyeditor since 1984(SM)
KOK Edit: your favorite copyeditor since 1984(SM) KOK Edit: your favorite copyeditor since 1984(SM) Katharine O'Moore Klopf
Blog

Wednesday, November 16, 2005

Iraq Human Rights Team Investigates U.S. Use of Phosphorus

As is often the case when it comes to reporting on U.S. human-rights violations in Iraq, the foreign media have once again beaten the U.S. media to the punch. The BBC reports that a human-rights team from Iraq is in Fallujah to investigate the use of white phosporus by the U.S. military against Iraqis:

Iraq probes US phosphorus weapons

An Iraqi human rights team has gone to the city of Falluja to investigate the use of white phosphorus as a weapon by US forces, a minister has told the BBC.

Acting Human Rights Minister Narmin Uthman said her staff would examine the possible effects on civilians.

The US has now admitted using white phosphorus as a weapon in Falluja last year, after earlier denying it.

The substance can cause burning of the flesh but is not illegal and is not classified as a chemical weapon.

The BBC's Caroline Hawley in Baghdad says it will be some time before the human rights team reports back.

In other developments in Iraq:
  • Sunni parties demand an international inquiry into the alleged abuse of more than 170 detainees by Iraqi forces in Baghdad.
  • Three US soldiers are killed in a roadside bomb near Baghdad.
  • A car bomb kills a US marine in Karmah, 80km (50 miles) west of Baghdad.


Italian TV station Rai alleged last week that the US had used phosphorus against built-up areas, and that civilians were killed.

The report sparked fury among Italian anti-war protesters, who demonstrated outside the US embassy in Rome.

The US initially said white phosphorus had been used only to illuminate enemy positions, but now admits it was used as a weapon.

BBC defence correspondent Paul Wood says having to retract that denial is a public relations disaster for the US.

A Pentagon spokesman, Lt Col Barry Venable, confirmed to the BBC the US had used white phosphorus "as an incendiary weapon against enemy combatants"—though not against civilians, he said.

He said earlier denials had been based on "poor information".

Washington is not a signatory to an international treaty restricting the use of the substance against civilians.

The US-led assault in November 2004 on Falluja—a stronghold of the Sunni insurgency west of Baghdad—displaced most of the city's 300,000 population and left many of its buildings destroyed.


'Particularly nasty'

San Diego journalist Darrin Mortenson, who was embedded with US marines during the assault on Falluja, told the BBC's Today radio programme he had seen white phosphorous used "as an incendiary weapon" against insurgents.

However, he "never saw anybody intentionally use any weapon against civilians", he said.

White phosphorus is highly flammable and ignites on contact with oxygen. If the substance hits a person's body, it will burn until deprived of oxygen.

Globalsecurity.org, a defence website, says: "Phosphorus burns on the skin are deep and painful... These weapons are particularly nasty because white phosphorus continues to burn until it disappears... it could burn right down to the bone."

Britain's Defence Secretary John Reid said UK forces had used white phosphorus in Iraq, but not as "anything other than a smokescreen to protect our troops when in action".

The UK Ministry of Defence said its use was permitted in battle in cases where there were no civilians near the target area.

But Professor Paul Rogers, of the University of Bradford's department of peace studies, said white phosphorus could be considered a chemical weapon if deliberately aimed at civilians.

He told the BBC: "It is not counted under the chemical weapons convention in its normal use but, although it is a matter of legal niceties, it probably does fall into the category of chemical weapons if it is used for this kind of purpose directly against people."




3 comments:

Anonymous said...

White phosphorous ignites spontaneously upon contact with oxygen. If it comes into contact with a persons skin it will continue to burn as long as oxygen is available, going as far down as the bone. As we have seen time and again the United States has had to backtrack and restate what is happening in regards to Iraq. Each revision of the "truth" results in a lowering of the world's opinion of the war. How refreshing it would be to have one story told, and it be the correct one the first time around!

All of this is very disturbing. In light of the topic you have a good site. Keep up the good work.

http://www.illmethinks.com

g

Katharine said...

Truth the first time around would indeed be refreshing, if not downright shocking, coming from this administration.

Thanks for the kind words, Gary. Your blog is pretty darn good, too.

RTO Trainer said...

Actually it will go as far as all the way through and out the other side.

As for revising, that's what happens when State is asked about Defense. I wouldn't plan to ask Commerce about foreign policy and get a full and correct answer either.

The use of WP was admited when this all came up last year. It died of lack of traction then. I dont' know why a year later will be different.

Template created by Makeworthy Media